Efficient Layout Process of Cylindrical Gears with Manufacturing Constraints
Time:17 Mar,2021
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="/ueditor/php/upload/image/20210317/1615967329132387.png" title="1615967329132387.png" alt="5.png"/></p><p>Cylindrical gear design can be divided
into three steps. In the first step, rough
gear pair dimensions such as center
distance and face width are being estimated.
Center distance and face width
are directly linked to the available space
(housing dimensions) and influence
the overall size, weight and cost of the
gears. In addition, the torque capacity
strongly depends on the chosen gear
materials, heat treatment and gear quality.
Although case-hardened gears tend
to give a higher torque capacity than nitrided
gears, a final machining process
like for example grinding is required to
compensate the hardening distortion.
Considering all these factors in a gear
rough sizing and finding the best solution
becomes a tough challenge.
In the next step, gear macro geometry
is defined. In a conventional gear
manufacturing process, the choice of
normal module, pressure angle and
reference profile are directly linked to
the cutter geometry. The consideration
of available tools in the early design
stage can save a lot of effort in the later
manufacturing steps. In addition, the
resulting gear geometry must satisfy
the required safety factors in accordance
with the selected gear strength
calculation method. Although a higher
gear root radius tends to give higher
root safeties, it may produce contact
interference and require a special cutter.
Evaluating different geometric solutions
and eliminating non-feasible
ones in the early design phase becomes
an important task.</p><p><br/></p><p>In the last phase, gear micro-geometry
is defined. The aim of this step is to
specify flank line and profile modifications
for optimal contact pattern, lower
noise emissions and various other
parameters. Here, the choice of modification
parameters is directly linked
to the final machining process. Often a grinding worm with associated dressing
wheel is used. If a specific list of grinders/dressers
is available, it makes sense
to consider them in the layout process
to avoid extra costs in the manufacturing
process.
In this paper we will present an efficient
gear layout procedure based on
international standards for gear geometry
and strength calculation with the
consideration of manufacturing constraints
such as lists of hobs, grinders
and dressers. The aim is to reduce
costs in the later manufacturing steps
or alternatively, to be able to predict the
need for additional tools in the early
design process.</p><p><br/></p><p>In the Gear Rough Dimensioning section,
an approach for gear rough dimensioning
is presented. The resulting center
distance and face width are used for
the next step, i.e.—gear fine-sizing. In
Gear Macrogeometry and Optimization,
the focus is on gear macro geometry.
Parameters such as normal module,
pressure angle, helix angle and reference
profile are found to meet certain optimization
criteria. Two macro-geometric solution examples are used for further
analysis; this is followed by Gear
MicroGeometry andOptimization. Lead
modifications are used to optimize the
load distribution along the flank line.
Profile modifications and contact analysis
are used to optimize the load distribution
in profile direction and reduce
gear noise. Each chapter also focuses on
selected manufacturing constraints that
influence the overall design process of
cylindrical gears.</p>